Hello Robert, What I was looking for was the opposite. A switch that allows the use of the : colon for static methods. I am talking about compiler error XS9114: Can't access the static member ... with the COLON operator. This must be new. Having a switch that would allow using the colon with X# 2.18...

Hello X# Team, After switching temporarily from X# 2.14 to 2.18 I'll got a lot of XS9114 compiler errors because our code uses : instead of . to access static members at many occasions. Is there a compiler switch to avoid this error? If not, I would like to suggest adding one for the next releases. ...

<t>I am also interested - I already have a collection of X# examples that I have put together in my GitHub repo.<br/> <br/> So I would be ready to start. I am just not sure how popular the site is (I have never heard about it before) and if publishing something there would have any real impact on th...

<t>Hello Dick,<br/> <br/> Thank you for the hint (and the very good summary) - I would have not found it myself probably. This looks like a good project and the tool obviously does what its needed.<br/> <br/> I am just not sure if a commerial product is a better choice for a large application and wh...

<t>Hello Robert,<br/> <br/> Although I have a "wild mix" of classes in the project with regular comments (like /// <summary>) and other styles (only // without any offiical tag) the compiler usually never complains.<br/> <br/> Its problably a mixture of several circumstances that results in a compil...

Hello Robert,

Its version 2.8.3.15 of XSharpCore.dll

I think is has something to do with a </summary> missing in a method comment below.

I will have to test this first and will report.

Regards,

Peter

<t>Hello X# Team,<br/> <br/> <br/> Whenever I put a<br/> <br/> /// <summary><br/> <br/> above a single class definition the whole project does not compile anymore due to an infamous XS 1569 error:<br/> <br/> XS1569: Error writing to XML documentation file: Fehler beim Vergleichen von zwei Array-Elem...

Hi Robert,

Only a few seconds after I hit submit I found the compiler settings.

This is very good, thank you for that small improvement.

But there is no mentioning in the readme.rtf?

Regards,
Peter

<t>Hello,<br/> <br/> Are their any plans to provide named arguments for the VO dialect too?<br/> <br/> I know there would be some kind of conflicts between different kinds of method call syntax.<br/> <br/> It would be very convinient for Office Interop method calls.<br/> <br/> Kind regards,<br/> Pet...

<t>Hello All,<br/> <br/> Just to add my experience - it got much better with version 2.8 (1.12)<br/> <br/> Only a few warning boxes from time to time and no problems with the editor any more.<br/> <br/> Don't foget to update Visual Studio 2019 as well (I am using version 16.10)<br/> <br/> Regards,<b...