Dick,
1 How can the exact same error re-appear despite the error handler>
No idea. Are you sure that the customer is running the new version of the EXE?
> And even better, is there a way to find the cause of the error? There is no reason to assume anything has changed or anything wrong is ...
Search found 2500 matches
- Sun Nov 23, 2025 9:13 pm
- Forum: VO & Vulcan
- Topic: Olewebbrowser exception despite errorhandler
- Replies: 4
- Views: 230
Re: VS 2026
Guys,
Our installer runs a tool to check which versions of VS are installed on your machine (see attachment).
When the last installer was created, there was no VS 2026 and the installer API does not include the "name" of the VS version.
So the installer "guesses" VS 2022. This will not be a problem ...
Our installer runs a tool to check which versions of VS are installed on your machine (see attachment).
When the last installer was created, there was no VS 2026 and the installer API does not include the "name" of the VS version.
So the installer "guesses" VS 2022. This will not be a problem ...
- Thu Oct 16, 2025 11:36 am
- Forum: 3rd party products
- Topic: ReportPro 2.x .NET PDF export with wingdings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5373
Re: ReportPro 2.x .NET PDF export with wingdings
Bernhard,
Can you create a ticket in our X# repo on Github for this, so this will not be forgotten and so you will be notified when we work on this?
Robert
Can you create a ticket in our X# repo on Github for this, so this will not be forgotten and so you will be notified when we work on this?
Robert
- Tue Oct 14, 2025 8:09 am
- Forum: Product
- Topic: VO vs X# performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2171
Re: VO vs X# performance
Wolfgang,
That is an excellent idea. I will write something and will produce an article in November
Robert
That is an excellent idea. I will write something and will produce an article in November
Robert
- Mon Oct 13, 2025 4:26 pm
- Forum: Product
- Topic: VO vs X# performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2171
Re: VO vs X# performance
Basile,
From my understanding :
- any method using USUAL parameters will generate late bound code
No that is not correct. This will not generate late bound code, but will generate a method call with usual parameters. If the method is known at compile time (the variable left of the ...
From my understanding :
- any method using USUAL parameters will generate late bound code
No that is not correct. This will not generate late bound code, but will generate a method call with usual parameters. If the method is known at compile time (the variable left of the ...
- Mon Oct 13, 2025 2:05 pm
- Forum: Product
- Topic: Translating C# to X#
- Replies: 4
- Views: 746
Re: Translating C# to X#
Kees,
ARRAY OF INT is not the same as INT[]
ARRAY OF INT produces a dynamic array, just like the arrays in VO, but its elements are of type INT and not of type USUAL.
Robert
ARRAY OF INT is not the same as INT[]
ARRAY OF INT produces a dynamic array, just like the arrays in VO, but its elements are of type INT and not of type USUAL.
Robert
- Mon Oct 13, 2025 2:03 pm
- Forum: Product
- Topic: VO vs X# performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2171
Re: VO vs X# performance
Basile,
ADS should be almost as fast in both VO and X#.
The handling of the indexes is done by the server and not by the client.
The macro compiler could be a bit slower, but that would not explain the speed difference that you're seeing.
I suspect that your app has a lot of late bound code. You may ...
ADS should be almost as fast in both VO and X#.
The handling of the indexes is done by the server and not by the client.
The macro compiler could be a bit slower, but that would not explain the speed difference that you're seeing.
I suspect that your app has a lot of late bound code. You may ...
- Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:47 pm
- Forum: Product
- Topic: XSI runtime installation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7171
Re: XSI runtime installation
Copying the redist folder + xsi.exe should be enough.
I see that we have not included xsi.exe in the list of files that may be distributed. But including that is no problem.
Robert
I see that we have not included xsi.exe in the list of files that may be distributed. But including that is no problem.
Robert
- Wed Sep 24, 2025 3:24 pm
- Forum: Product
- Topic: Windows.Forms and the VO.App class
- Replies: 50
- Views: 69994
Re: Windows.Forms and the VO.App class
Kees,
Make sure you copy the CATO*.DLL files to the output folder
Robert
Make sure you copy the CATO*.DLL files to the output folder
Robert
- Wed Sep 17, 2025 9:48 pm
- Forum: VO & Vulcan
- Topic: Cause of GoTO failure?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 47359
Re: Cause of GoTO failure?
Dick,
I think that a SetOrder(0) followed by a Goto will not evaluate any index expressions.
So the Goto should not fail, even when one of the indexes is corrupt.
Of course, if you update the record after the Goto() then all the index expressions will be re-evaluated, to see if any of the indexes ...
I think that a SetOrder(0) followed by a Goto will not evaluate any index expressions.
So the Goto should not fail, even when one of the indexes is corrupt.
Of course, if you update the record after the Goto() then all the index expressions will be re-evaluated, to see if any of the indexes ...

